The British government recently tried to introduce legislation to outlaw forced marriages, but as usual when one of Cameron's “tokens” is given a job, it turned out badly and the British Supreme Court threw it out. But give credit where it's due, the government has tried to establish some humanitarian credentials by trying to put an end to this medieval and barbaric practice, which has no place in modern society and has not been acceptable to the people of England for centuries. David Cameron himself recently said “Forced marriage is little more than slavery”

So how is it that the British government are looking to help women forced into marriage against their will, a chance to break free from their shackles – yet as we have seen this week in Parliament, are doing all in their power to prevent the British people having a referendum on EU membership? Is there not a direct parallel here, between the individual rights of women and our collective rights as a nation to re-establish some freedom and sovereignty?

And it is only the right to hold a referendum, not the actual referendum itself – if membership of the EU is as fantastic as Mr Cameron says it is, he should have no problem showing us the numbers that prove his case, surely? What on earth is he worried about?

David Cameron feels it is wrong for a father to force his daughter to marry a man she may never even have met – but finds it perfectly acceptable to keep the British people married to Europe! The British government tells our servicemen in Afghanistan that fighting the Taliban helps to establish democracy and protect women's rights, and yet Cameron's own “Taliban” are also guilty of denying the British and English people their democratic right to a say in their own future!

Let us look at the facts here –

THE WIFE
The British people (the wife) are unhappy about EU membership (the marriage), and want out. The wife's father convinced them that the marriage would help heal some old wounds between their two families and was a good match, but it was quickly apparent that she was only married for her dowry.

THE HUSBAND
The EU (the husband) spends all the housekeeping and treats his wife like dirt. When questioned where all the money has been spent, he just gives his shoulders a Gallic shrug and changes the subject. In spite of his wife's pleading, he has never at any time apologised or shown any inclination to change his ways – in fact, he is twisting her arm for even more money, to the point where she is having to borrow from moneylenders.

THE WIFE'S FATHER
The British government (the wife's father) worried about the loss of well paid EU jobs and pensions after British politics (and loss of face by not controlling his disobedient daughter) constantly ignores his daughter's wishes and denies her any help to get out of this terrible relationship. It is a question of honour, and a divorce would bring shame on his family.

If this were a marriage between two people, the wife could easily petition for a divorce citing irreconcilable differences on the grounds of her husband's unreasonable behaviour, and be a free woman within weeks. It is obvious to the English Radicals, that not only is divorce the best option for Britain from its abusive and over- bearing husband Europe, but the English people should question whether they want any further dealings with the pig of a father who pushed them into marriage in the first place, and made it so difficult to escape –
the British government.

All the major national parties bear equal blame for our European “marriage” – the Tories took us in, and Labour signed up to treaties that took our sovereignty, and only a few brave souls in each party have ever dared defy their party whips for fear of punishment. Cameron's oily platitudes to the House of Commons stating that the British government will eventually reclaim powers from the EU, is as blatant and pathetic a lie as any he has ever mouthed – just as the father tells his daughter that her husband will change if given more time, so just be patient a little longer.

The British government, whether Labour or Tory, have a very similar mindset to the Taliban - uncompromising, arrogant and domineering. This is an unacceptable situation in our eyes, and the EU referendum issue is yet one more reason why the voters of England, and Britain, need to organise themselves into a union, dedicated to opposing the national parties. Who in England can hold up their hands and say that they are feeling any benefit from the national party system of government -

The pensioners too poor to eat and heat? The unemployed who can't find work because EU immigrants have claimed all the unskilled jobs? Workers from the Bombardier factory losing their jobs because the Tory government bought German? The people of Runcorn forced to accept a huge incinerator by a Labour government, because the local Labour council chose not to oppose it? Servicemen sent under-equipped to fight and die in foreign hell-holes because a corrupt prime minister conned his own MP's into declaring a war? The taxpayers who have to fund the war? The list goes on and on.

Enough is enough. We only have one legitimate weapon at our disposal, the right to vote, and the next major battle is years away - but if all the groups mentioned above joined forces and fight as one army, by using their votes together in the same way, they could clear the field of their common enemy in one decisive battle. We need a National Voters Union -  let's get organised and start making our votes really count.







 


Comments




Leave a Reply